FEEDBACK     HELP
WELCOME: Not Logged In HOME | MY ACCOUNT | ABOUT US | CONTACT US
SEARCH
ADVANCED
 SHOP OUR CATALOG
 JOURNALS
 Decker Intellectual Properties Websites >
 REGISTRATION
 FREE EMAIL TOC
 AUTHOR INFORMATION >
 FAQS
 CONFERENCES
 PERMISSION GUIDELINES
 SHIPPING INFORMATION
 PRIVACY POLICY
 ADVERTISERS INFORMATION >
 PHARMA SALES >
 DISTRIBUTION PARTNERS
External Access > PubMed LinkOut
ISSN Number: 1203-4754
Title: Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery
Volume Number: 13
Issue Number: 03
Page Number: 134
Published: 6 time(s) per Year

Results of a Survey Regarding Perioperative Antiseptic Practices

BACKGROUND:Currently, there are many options available for perioperative antiseptic techniques for cutaneous surgery. However, there is a paucity of scientific evidence available to suggest which techniques are worthwhile and which are not.OBJECTIVES:To determine if there is any consensus among dermatologic surgeons as to which perioperative techniques are being used and which are not.METHODS:A questionnaire regarding perioperative techniques was mailed to the 641 members of the American College of Mohs Surgery (ACMS).RESULTS:Forty-one percent of those queried returned the questionnaire within the allotted time. Surgical caps and booties were the least used antiseptic techniques. Respondents tended to use antiseptic techniques less often for less invasive procedures and more often for more invasive procedures. Few people used surgical caps, surgical gowns, or booties for any procedure.CONCLUSIONS:Many traditional perioperative antiseptic techniques are not being performed by respondents. Calculated infection rates are very low for all queried procedures.
Already A Subscriber?

PubMed Publication LinkOut Login
Username:   
Password:   

Non-Subscriber?

If you are not a current online subscriber to Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery then please click on the link below to purchase the article:

Buy Now!